Trespassers Will Be Prosecuted


Trespassers will be prosecuted

31 July 2011: Government plans to criminalise squatting will affect rights to both housing and to protest

says Liz Davies
From Red Pepper Magazine

Occupations like the one at UCL last year could become criminal
offences under the government’s proposals.

The Ministry of Justice is consulting on proposals to criminalise squatting with the intention of introducing amendments to the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill in October.

In launching the consultation however, ministers were anything but open-minded as to the outcome. Justice minister Crispin Blunt said: ‘I am clear that the days of so-called squatters’ rights must end and
squatters who break the law receive a proper punishment.’ Meanwhile housing minister Grant Shapps said he would tip ‘the scales of justice in favour of the law-abiding homeowner once and for all.’

The idea that squatters break into people’s homes while they are out at the shops is a right-wing media myth. It simply doesn’t happen – and one of the reasons why is because squatting someone’s home is
already a criminal offence. Other reasons are that squatting someone’s home is anti-social and ineffective.

Shapps’s ‘law-abiding home-owner’ is already well protected. What the government is trying to do is to make it a criminal offence to squat an empty, non-residential building. Even without the support of the
criminal law, owners of empty non-residential buildings are not exactly at a disadvantage. They can obtain possession orders from the courts very quickly and instruct bailiffs to remove squatters. When
squats keep going for weeks, months or even years, it’s not because the law is somehow ‘pro-squatter’. It’s because the owner hasn’t bothered to get a court order to remove them.

Criminalising squatting raises all sorts of problems. First, some
people squat who would otherwise be homeless and housed by local
authorities. Second, the police are notoriously reluctant to
intervene in what they see as housing disputes. Housing law is
notoriously complex and the standard police response is to say to all
concerned: ‘Let the civil courts sort it out.’ Third, it’s impossible
to criminalise squatting – where people want a home – without also
criminalising other forms of trespass, such as occupations.

Should workers who non-violently occupy their workplace or students
who occupy academic buildings be criminalised? They are already
subject to civil law – the employer or academic institution can
obtain a possession order. Should the employer be entitled to send
the police in to remove a non-violent occupation? No doubt the Tories
think so, but do the rest of us?

What criminalising squatting will certainly do is act as a deterrent.
At the moment, all that squatters risk is that they may be evicted in
a few days’ time. However, if the landowner can call the police and
have squatters immediately arrested and removed, far fewer people
will take that risk.

And that would be a shame because squatting empty buildings helps to
house people and maintain the building at the same time.
Criminalising trespass will also deter legitimate political protest,
such as occupations, peace camps or climate camp-type events.

The Ministry of Justice’s consultation closes on 5 October. Responses
can be sent to:

This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

There’s an
extensive lobby group in favour of criminalising squatting, so the
opposite view needs to be voiced loud and clear.