Four quick observations.

ONE. This is how Ryan Gentle signed his name in 2006.

This is how Ryan Kennedy signed his name in 2009: Notice any similarities?  Elongated shape, structure of the R. How do they compare with the signature represented to be Ryan’s on October 28, 2014?

No. Hmmm.

TWO. How about a conspiracy theory?  In the October 28th Order, it is stated that Ryan’s counsel is Francis Hoar.

However, it seems like this information is not supposed to be known. Notice the redactions here: Recall that Ryan has previously represented himself as an attorney. Also, recall Ryan Gentle’s middle name was Francis.

Does that signature look more like a “Ryan” or a “Francis”?

THREE. Syscoin’s attorney doesn’t like to publish his name nor sign it.

Syscoin’s counsel is Richard Howlett, a solo attorney, who appears to have trade named his practice Selachii, LLP.  SOMEONE, ANYONE, please hook Selachii up with some free letter head, puh-leeze.

FOUR. There seems to be some confusion about which judge signed the October 27th injunction order.

Apparently, there was an emergency injunction on October 24, 2014 granted by Judge Hamblen. This injunction was obtained without notice to Ryan, so there had to be another hearing. That hearing was set for October 27, 2014, which Ryan apparently did not attend. Despite not attending, Ryan was allegedly ordered to return bitcoins belonging to Syscoin the next day. However, the next day, October 28, he purportedly moved the court to vacate the injunction order of October 27, which the Court granted. Here is his statement accompanying the motion:

It is curious that Ryan says the injunction order on the 27th was obtained without notice from Judge Hamblen, given that Judge Williams in his vacation order never references Hamblen.  In fact, Judge Williams references his own order from the previous day and not Judge Hamblen.

The Consent Order dated October 29, 2014 also does not reference Judge Hamblen (this order was likely jointly drafted by the parties).