Tag Archives: budget 2015

Budget 2015: Is this punishment for Millbank?

This article is an opinion piece written by a member of the Free University of Sheffield; it is not an official statement.

This week we mourn our lost futures.  Student maintenance grants are gone.  Housing benefit is gone.  No pay rise for young workers.  No debt relief for students.  Executioner Osborne tells us that economic security is at the top of his agenda.  Economic security for whom?  Our future looks far from secure.

The Tory government is trying to crush the dreams of a whole generation.  No housing benefit for 18-21 year olds is nothing more than an attempt to beat people into employment.  “Go back home and live with your parents”, they tell us.  But what about the people who have been chucked out of their family home?  What about the hundreds or thousands of trans* youth rejected by their parents, for whom independence means the chance for a safer life?  What about the working class youths from former mining communities, whose hopes for employment in their hometown were obliterated by Thatcher?  They tell us we’ve either got to ‘earn or learn’, but in reality the choice is between earning a pittance or learning to live with a debilitating level of debt.

Osborne wants to create a legion of exploited young workers to supporting his failing economy (see page 34, paragraph 1.126 of the Budget Document).  The new, age-discriminatory minimum wage—I refuse to call it a living wage (see why here and here)—excludes under-25s, leaving us to fend for ourselves in the Wild West of the labour market.  It’s been dressed up as employment “opportunities” for young people when the reality is the opposite.  The Tories are driving a race to the bottom, creating a class of highly-skilled young workers ripe for exploitation.  Bosses will be guzzling up this wellspring of cheap labour in no time.  Grossly underpaid work isn’t an opportunity for young people.  It’s an opportunity for the rich to get richer.

Then there’s tuition fees.  In his budget, Osborne announced that universities would have the chance to increase their fees with inflation—but only if these institutions offer “high teaching quality” (page 59).  This means that elite universities will be able to raise their fees and rake in the extra cash while poorer universities struggle to make ends meet.  The gulf between the elite universities and the rest will widen, and the universities which are already struggling will be left out in the cold.  It’s no surprise that these are the most working-class universities.

The hike in fees will most be linked to the “Teaching Excellence Framework” (TEF), a dangerous new audit and league table for teaching.  Like the Research Excellence Framework, this will lead to the bullying of staff.  And it’s likely that the quality of teaching will be assessed on the grades that students receive, putting even more pressure on students to perform well in assessments.  Mental health issues are already at epidemic levels among students.  A recent study by the National Union of Teachers linked such “accountability measures” in schools with increased anxiety and extreme stress.  The same is certainly true of universities.  The TEF can only undermine teaching and learning.

Osborne delivered the final blow by bringing his axe down on maintenance grants.  These grants provide a lifeline to working-class students as they go through uni, helping with the cost of rent and food.  Unlike loans, grants don’t have to be repaid.  They don’t saddle students with a crippling amount of debt.  They give students the freedom to learn and study without a debilitating anxiety about how to pay the next lot of rent, or how to ever pay off this debt.  Debt acts as a form of social control, forcing students to work, work, work on top of their studies.  As the years wear on, we have less and less time to experiment, less and less time to study, less and less energy to think.

All this makes me wonder: is this punishment for Millbank?  Is this punishment for the riots in 2011?

Let them punish us, but let them know that we will defend ourselves.  Our generation will not be crushed.  In a society where humans have become resources and dignity has been swapped for productivity, the only way to assert our humanity and to assert our dignity is through resistance.  Our actions must scream no!  When support staff and lecturers go on strike, we must bring our universities to a standstill.  Remember, those at the top do not care for us.  So as we resist, as we occupy, we must also care for each other.  And as we demand a better world—as we demand free education, social security, genuine democracy—we must also try to build that world.  They will always tell us that there is no alternative.  There is an alternative, but only if we want it.

This week we mourn our lost futures.  Next week we build new ones.

Grants to Loans: Osborne is using student debt for social control

walking to work

This article is an opinion piece written by a member of the Free University of Sheffield; it is not an official statement.

“Students who acquire large debts putting themselves through school are unlikely to think about changing society. When you trap people in a system of debt they can’t afford the time to think. Tuition Fee increases are a disciplinary technique, and by the time students graduate, they are not only loaded with debt, but have also internalised the disciplinarian culture. This makes them efficient components of the consumer economy.”

This famous quote of Noam Chomsky is so pertinent because of George Osborne’s recent announcement that, among a fresh wave of cruel austerity measures, living grants for the poorest students will be replaced by loans. These grants are important as they allow students from low-income families, often without a tradition of accessing higher education, to go some way to being able to afford university life, without the added burden of years of heavy debt.

Many have recently pointed out that greater student debt isn’t even of much economic benefit to the government, as it will have to absorb all unpaid debt. This will be a significant amount as around three quarters of students will still be repaying into their 50s, when it is wiped, 30 years after graduation. However, Chomsky rightly identifies the more deep-rooted problem of increased student debt, and why student loans are actually such a valuable investment for the government.

Debt is an incredibly effective form of social control, and this policy is as much about power as it is about a certain vision of economics. Debt is used to pacify the population into conformity and to quell resistance. Chomsky points out that, if you leave university with swathes of debt (upwards of £44,000 in the UK), your priority is unlikely to be fighting to change the systems which makes that debt necessary for a successful career or prosperous life. Instead, you are likely to work within those systems to make enough money to pay off your huge debt and live relatively comfortably. Eventually.

“They can’t afford time to think.” Graduates literally can’t afford time to think. They literally can’t afford the time to be critical of the system that has burdened them with such huge debt. They can’t afford to imagine a life outside of it or to fight to forge a better society. They feel that they must get a job as soon as they graduate and begin chipping away at the weight of debt on their shoulders.

“By the time students graduate, they are not only loaded with debt, but have also internalised the disciplinarian culture.” It is easy to realise the disciplinary nature of education from cradle to college: homogeneous uniforms, hierarchical organisation, authoritarian teachers, etc. Higher education, however, is more subtle in its disciplining of students. It uses debt to repress the creativity, imagination and activism that the human mind would be capable of when free from the crippling constraints of wage labour and the employability agenda which university forces onto students.

“This makes them efficient components of the consumer economy.” Ultimately, this is what it comes down to: further entrenching this system of neoliberal economics, politics and society which thrives on consumption. With graduates forced into work by the burden of their debt, they quickly become another uncritical cog in the neoliberal machine. Too stressed, preoccupied or busy to imagine a society beyond neoliberalism, the machine keeps on functioning.

Student debt is a barrier to higher education for the poorest families, and the policy to abolish living grants is scandalous for this reason alone. However, we must be aware of the government’s more cynical use of student debt to control its population. Maybe many students will never repay their debt to the economic cost of the government. But they are making a great investment by creating generations of graduates who, as Noam Chomsky suggests, cannot even afford to challenge the system on which those with existing political and economic power continue to thrive.