Tagged: cryptocurrency Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • isvarahparamahkrsnah

    isvarahparamahkrsnah 8:21 am on May 29, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: BitTube, blockchain, blockstack, cryptocurrency, dApps, , DTube, LBRY, , Steemit   

    Crappy Privacy Alternatives: Blockchain, Blockstack and DApps 

    I haven’t posted in a few days. I was procrastinating and got distracted by other things. But now that I’m here, I’m feeling angry. And so I’m going to expose crappy technology in the privacy world.

    Blockchain was developed by some anonymous Japanese dude to serve as a public transaction ledger for bitcoin. The dude invented the cryptocurrency and it’s ledger – bitcoin and blockchain.

    How does blockchain work? As a ledger. I suppose it keeps a public and permanent record of stuff. It could be centralized or decentralized.

    I’m not a blockchain or cryptocurrency fan. As a result, my understanding of the technology is pretty vague.

    Blockchain may serve it’s purpose well for it’s “banking services”. But other than that, it’s crap.

    Take any other services based on blockchain – they’re crap.

    What is Blockstack? How does it work? I don’t know and I don’t care! Their website is inaccessible using Tor – You have to solve some crappy captcha. I HATE CAPTCHA.

    When you go through the Blockstack website, it promotes a bunch of crappy apps with no text that summarizes how the technology works.

    Okay. I had to give their whitepaper a brief glance to see if I could find anything useful. Here’s what I see: “business logic and data processing runs on the client.” No wonder blockstack apps are so slow. That’s the main reason why blockstack apps are crappy – they’re too damn slow.

    What is DApps? DApps – an acronym for decentralized applications, is the official name for applications that use blockchain technology to provide some services. Are blockstack apps DApps? Yes. But I don’t see that mentioned anywhere on their crappy website.

    Now I tried to look for some dApps which privacy advocates may have heard of: Ethereum Name Service, DTube, Minds.com, beta.cent.co, SpringRole.com, LBRY, Steemit, Hive Blog, Sense Chat, BitTube etc. And these are just apps which have managed to have a usable interface with simple user interactions. The rest of the dApps that I’ve come across have multiple steps to sign up and log into individual apps. It’s a headache that nobody wants to deal with. Regular apps and websites have simple sign up and login methods. dApps have methods from hell. Did I mention how painfully slow they are?

    When I was looking for an alternative to YouTube a few years ago, I gave LBRY a shot. I searched for videos to watch and found a bunch of crappy ones. I never opened that app again.

    LBRY, Steemit, BitTube, Minds.com probably have the simplest blockchain implementation that I’ve seen. Yet they still manage to suck so bad, it’s not even worth trying them again.

    And this brings me to my conclusion. Any technology that involves money will become crappy so fast, it will make your stupid head spin. Especially, when the currency involved is in crypto. Now why am I saying this? Because it’s true. The incentive to monetize everything on the internet has destroyed some really good projects. Everyone who gets involved in such projects has one goal in mind – earn some crypto. Right from the developers down to the users. Everybody’s thinking about making some bitcoins and it drives the entire network down the drain.

    What’s the future of these technologies? Unless someone implements it for a Free and Open Source Software cause, there is no future. These projects will gain no traction unless they’re separated from the cryptocurrency side. I know the devs need to make a living. But rubbing the crypto crap on everything will doom them right from the start.

    I never liked advent of cryptocurrency. Just like real-world money, the greed it brought alongside destroyed everything. If money is the motive, what’s the difference between blockchain apps and real world banking services? Privacy? Security? Gimme a break!

    So there is no difference between commercialized premium web services and blockchain crypto-based dApps. It’s like one arm picking food directly from the plate and shoving it into the mouth while the other wraps around the head and slings it sideways while the mouth tries to catch it. How would you prefer to eat your meal?

     
  • isvarahparamahkrsnah

    isvarahparamahkrsnah 12:01 pm on May 10, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: business, , cryptocurrency, keybase, ,   

    The Privacy Business 

    Since the Snowden leaks in 2013, a lot of people have gotten into privacy. But not all of them are in it for the right reasons.

    There has been a growing trend in the development and marketing of privacy tools and networks that work in the same way as mundane corporations. And their main motive is money. How can they make a cash cow out of privacy?

    Hence the privacy business.

    Each of these businesses start out with individuals who form teams and grow into a small company. They release their tools and services in the name of privacy. They have Github repos, Reddit accounts, HN accounts, Twitter accounts, and Facebook accounts. They release alpha versions of the front-end software with early access or invite only access, then beta releases, then the finalized major releases. Their goal is to create a large following and dedicated user base, before they go rogue and turn their backs on their loyal users. The entire process may take anywhere from 2-5 years, but they are patient. In the end, they know they can make enough money to retire, once they sell out.

    If their project fails to gain momentum and a large following, they will drop it and disappear, onto the next cash cow, something they can exploit for money.

    If they offer premium services, they are likely to stick to the business. But if they offer completely free services, then it’s highly likely that, at some point, they will sell out to some corporation for the ultimate buck. Some people call it acquihire, others call it joining; I call it selling out.

    Over the years, I’ve come across several “privacy” services, that ended up either shutting down or selling out. And I’ve become very cautious when any “entrepreneur” shows up with some privacy-oriented services. It makes me questions what their motives are, how long they plan to stay open, when they’re going to sell out, and for how much.

    The privacy diaspora is a murky swamp on the outskirts of the internet. Just when you thought you were absolutely safe, you might wake up to a rude surprise.

    I’m going to conclude this with the perfect example of Keybase. Keybase is an encryption service that was launched in 2014. In the alpha stage, it was invite-only. I remember signing up for an invite and waiting for a few days before receiving one a few years ago.

    On 7th May 2020, Keybase announced that it had been acquired by Zoom. Anyone who keeps in touch with the latest Tech news would know just how bad Zoom really is. As I scrolled through hundreds of surprised reactions from loyal users on HN and Reddit, I realized none of us had bothered to do our research. We just followed the hype from the Tech media. And the Tech media is not a good source of information for a privacy enthusiast.

    Looking at the Keybase blog, I see exactly how Keybase raised their initial $10.8M investment. And I can’t recognize any of the names as related to the privacy world. The Stellar wallets and free crypto was the final attempt to increase their user base before they sold out. Why would any small company that provides free services (not to forget the 250GB free storage!) give out $119M to their users?

    Looking through the members of the Keybase team, only one of them had a Mastodon account. I doubt any of the others had bothered to look up the Fediverse much less join it. This is why the Fediverse was by large, left out of the Keybase user accounts verification.

    The background of the founding members of Keybase shows that they were working with OkCupid before starting Keybase. Since OkCupid is a commercialized dating service with a terrible privacy history, this doesn’t exactly inspire confidence in the Keybase founding team.

    I’m disappointed in myself. Instead of doing my research and questioning the motives of the company that provided a unique service for free, I allowed myself to be fooled by the mainstream Tech journalists. What do the mainstream tech journalists know about the privacy world? Nothing! I’m glad I stopped wasting my time reading tech news. Tech news is basically a huge advertising and marketing medium for the companies that violate their users privacy even after being paid hundreds and thousands of dollars.

    I’m going to delete my Keybase account before midnight. The next time some company comes along with some innovative privacy services, I’m going to get up their arse with a microscope and release a full-fledged detailed review of their business.

     
c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel