The Daily Blackshirt wrote this: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3258234/Truth-rabble-bringing-fear-streets.html
So I wrote this:
“Truth about the rabble bringing fear to our streets: Working class warriors? No, middle class spongers and so-called academics” – Hahahahahahahaha!
“Age has not mellowed university graduate Ian Bone” – Good on him, does it have to? Is it a shameful thing for a working-class person like Ian to have gone to university?
“He may now be a 68-year-old grandfather” – And?
“but he is full of burning resentment.” – So? He has a good right to be as do other working-class people.
“Almost all his life has been devoted to waging war on the rich while claiming benefits funded by their taxes.” – Because it is only the rich who pay taxes right? Do a lot of rich people not channel their funds into tax havens? No?
“He moved to London in the 1990s, still claiming benefits” – Lives in London and claiming benefits? Sounds like the Royal Family to me, where is your denunciation of them as “scroungers”? The silence is deafening. 
“and now lives there in a £330,000 home with the mortgage paid off” – God forbid should he live in secure and stable accomodation and for the record, a house for £330,000 in London is cheap!
“which belongs to his partner Jane Nicholl, 64″…”She, too, is an anarchist” – Well spank my arse and call me Chuckles the Clown, Jane Nicholl is also an anarchist? Well who would have thought it?
“Ian’s anger about his childhood has not been eased by his immense good fortune” – What immense good fortune? He lives in a house owned by his partner and is on benefits, he is hardly Lord Ashcroft.
“charmed life on benefits” – You obviously have no clue about life on benefits if you think that it is a charmed existence.
“More recently, Bone — who has five children with two former partners” – Respect! Just means he is virile as fuck! 
“posted pictures of himself angrily brandishing a walking stick during a protest against the so-called gentrification of London.” – “So-called”…are you denying gentrification is happening?
“Last week, he was the key figure behind a vicious mob attack when riot police and helicopters were deployed after more than a thousand people descended on a fashionable part of East London” – The article just said “so-called gentrification” as if its existence is in doubt however it then goes on to say “a fashionable part of East London”. This basically means that the once working-class area of Shoreditch (The area in question) has now became “fashionable” i.e. gentrified. They basically do not want to say ‘gentrified’ simply because they want to con people into thinking that it does not exist.
“The community in the part of East London that Class War targeted on Saturday night was nothing short of terrified as the mob descended.” – You mean all of the middle and upper-class whingers and colonisers were terrified?
“And what was striking is that it wasn’t just unemployed ne’er-do-wells such as Bone who responded to the call” – But I thought we are all middle-class? (“A ne’er-do-well is a rogue, vagrant or vagabond without means of support; a good-for-nothing louse”)
“but a motley crew which included well-dressed youngsters with iPhones” – Oh well, because all working-class people are in reality incapable of dressing nice and having an iPhone because you know, only middle and upper-class people have such things. Pfffffft!
“as well as university academics” – It seems you only condemn people for being academics when they are on the opposite side of the political spectrum to yourselves.
“As families with young children cowered” – Where is the evidence that children were even there? Why were they out at that time in an area usually full of drunken revelers anyway?
“ the protesters managed to break in” – Errrrrm, no they did not.
“burnt an effigy of a policeman” – Again they did not, as funny as that would have been. There was however an effigy of a police officer attached to the sound system (Anyone can see this from pictures and videos).
One of the Keery brothers (Owners of Cereal Killer Cafe) said in the article: “They are violent bullies and we want them prosecuted” – Waaaaaaaaaaaah, they stole my lunch money and called me names, waaaaaaaaaaahhhh!
“They see us as the face of gentrification” – They are not THE face of it but a potent example of it. They sell cereal for £4 a bowl in an area of 49% poverty and where some people live on less then £4 a day. £4 for a bowl of cereal, cereal being basic sustenance, is grotesque. It is not only a slap in the face but it is also clearly aimed at being accessible for everyone. Anyway, the Keery brothers make out as if they are victims running a ‘local business’ or something like that when in fact, cereal at that price in an increasingly gentrified area, is clearly not aimed at local people, least of all working-class locals.
“The brothers describe themselves as ‘very working-class’” – They were working-class. Anyway, you condemn, as being middle-class, the likes of Lisa McKenzie for having a decent wage and being able to go on holiday and; Ian Bone and Jane Nicholl yet portray two well off gentrifying business owners as just two salt of the Earth working-class blokes trying to earn a bit of money. Double standards there I think.
“who left school at 16 and worked for years in shops, pubs and clubs” – As do many other people, nothing out of the ordinary here.
“Foxtons estate agents have had their windows smashed because they are considered to represent the evil of gentrification.” – Well yeah because they are major players in it!
“Besides Ian Bone, the other main agitators are also drawn from the ranks of the middle classes and the university-educated.” – Such as? I want names and faces if it is true.
“Perhaps the most preposterous of them is Dr Lisa Mckenzie, 47, a research fellow at the prestigious London School of Economics, where such academic posts attract salaries of about £40,000.” – So a working-class woman who has lived all of her life (Until recently of course) on council estates and had to take an access course in order to become an undergraduate is now middle-class because she has a stable job and a decent income? As for the £40,000 salary, some construction workers can earn as much in London, I guess they are middle-class too!
“Denying that she is middle-class” – Because she is not!
“she ludicrously compares the cereal protest to the struggles of the Suffragettes and Nelson Mandela” – OK granted I do not get the Nelson Mandela part but the Suffragettes engaged in property damage and direct action on a street level so yes, that parallel is very apt.
“A mother of one with her hair dyed bright red” –Oh shocking! I bet she even wears dresses above her ankles and has the legs on her table exposed! The outrage, the humanity of it!
“and posts details on her Facebook page of holidays to far-flung destinations such as Barbados, Las Vegas and Jamaica as well as New York, Milan, Rome, Paris and Barcelona.” – Because working-class people do not deserve to go on holiday and of course no working-class person has EVER been to such destinations. It seems the authors of this article think we should stick to Benidorm, Tenerife and Magaluf.
“she studied sociology at Nottingham University and went on to gain funding for a Masters degree and a PhD” – Shocking! Disgusting! She should be put on the rack!
“The daughter and granddaughter of miners, she honed her hatred during the miners’ strike of 1984-85” – (In a posh accent) Oh, what a very middle-class background you have Lisa McKenzie.
“On the march against the Cereal Killer cafe, she carried a placard bearing the slogan ‘We must devastate the avenues where the wealthy live” – It is a banner not a placard! Shows how observant Daily Blackshirt reporters are.
“She insists that not all the protesters that night were academics like herself” – Because they were/are not. Some are unemployed, some work in occupations such as community work, construction work and so on. The Daily Blackshirt has basically picked up on 2 “academics” and two other people who really have done nothing wrong out of a thousand. I think ‘clutching at straws’ is how the expression goes.
Regarding Dr Elmer: “He now lives in fashionable Stoke Newington in North London” – There they go again, using the “fashionable” euphemism instead of the more raw “gentrification”. I do not know Dr. Elmer and do not know if he is middle-class or not but what I do know is that for the time being Stoke Newington does contain a sizable working-class population and always has done. It is not as if living in Stoke Newington renders someone non-working-class.
Dr. Elmer said: “Asked about the aims of the protest, he was not amused. ‘Your idiotic attempts to bring the issues of gentrification and homelessness down to the supposed class origins of the protesters [are] worthy of the schoolyard at Eton.” – Well said, he is right!
He also said: “‘The cereal cafe wouldn’t be there if there weren’t people who could afford, and have the inclination, to spend £4 on a bowl of cereal. The cafe isn’t just a cultural symbol of gentrification, it’s an instrument of the economic colonisation of the area” – Well said, spot on!
“Another well-heeled supporter of the mob was Adam Barr, 23, who grew up in a four-bedroom house in the East Yorkshire village of Cottingham, where his father is a company director” – Fair enough but he is among the exception bearing in mind there were 1,000 participants of the Fuck Parade.
“Meanwhile, the cereal cafe brothers, who prefer the virtues of hard work and enterprise to living off the State” – Oh so, Lisa McKenzie working hard to get through her access course and all the way to a PhD and get a decent income to boot is bad but ‘hard workers’ that are the Keery brothers are employers i.e. people living off other people’s labour.
“spent last week tidying up and trying to put their business back together” – I am cwying, my heart bleeds for them.
The irony is that the middle-class Tory supporting journalists that wrote this article are casting aspersions on people’s class, using double speak and double standards in order to try and back up their ill thought out argument. It has failed, miserably.
Lots of Love,
OT xxxxxxxxx